Are you useful?
I preach about the miracle of constraints and their ability to boost creativity in anyone. But I see un-useful constraints being used all the time by creators, so I wanted to make a small list of examples to clarify what a useful constraint looks like.
There’s only two real constraints when publishing anything online:
What is useful to your audience?
Useful:
- Getting to the point
- Finding obscure ideas, people, and resources for solving specific challenges
- Finding entertaining ideas, people, and resources
- Providing more value than you ask for in return
- Having a consistent publishing schedule
Not useful:
- Over-designing to seem professional rather than human
- Over-formatting for topic: Podcasting like you’re on the radio in the 90s (you don’t need segments)
- Over-formatting for style: Emailing or blogging with sections for links versus essays (readers don’t care)
What is useful for you?
Useful:
- Time blocking your work
- Having a consistent publishing schedule
- Limiting word counts
- Limiting when or how your work is published
- Using process-based templates and automation
- Being imperfect and humanizing your publishing (versus “personalizing”)
- Ridding yourself of any work unrelated to your objective (like stressing over photos when consistent writing is your goal)
Not useful:
- Using templates and automation that detract from your publishing voice
- Being overly acceptable to everyone
- Limiting or expanding your publishing based on SEO or trends
As you can see, there’s some overlap in those examples. When you find a constraint that works for you and your audience – like publishing a one-paragraph newsletter every day or creating visual essays on the backs of business cards – you’ve found a set of successful constraints. Congrats!